on teleportation

Well I thought I was going to sleep but it turns out I just needed to have a three hour mostly-eyes-closed think.

Not the primary part of the think, but I think I have reasonably solved (to my satisfaction) the puzzle of teleportation.

I have spent many years mulling on the physics of the problem, figuring the answer would be along the lines of "most matter is actually space, and that is why monks could walk through walls" or "time actually exists all at once, and so time travel will mostly be a matter of learning to comprehend that truth" ... but then with that latter one comes the problem of time-space: presuming we want to time-travel and end up somewhere on the planet earth (and not, for instance, in the void of space between galaxies), one would also need to comprehend also and compensate for -- quite exactly if one wanted to actually arrive on or very close to the surface of the planet -- the insanely fast motion of the planet (and the solar system, and the galaxy) through space.

And there is the problem, as a person travelling to a new space-time where quite a bit of matter already exists, of what happens to that matter, which is not going to happily co-exist with all the new matter the person is manifesting there-then.

This problem of time-space shift of course also applies to teleportation-by-intuitive-grasp-of-the-physics.  Pretty tricky to not end up in space, real problem of what happens to the displaced matter (/which matter ends up displaced and how painful is that for the matter involved).   It's actually somewhat easier, presuming this mathematical-comprehension problem is the path to a workable solution for teleportation, to move a planet into orbit around another star -- one could theoretically work out where there was likely to be little or no space dust in the proposed new orbit -- than to move a person around "on earth."

So tonight it occurs to me that the primary problems could be solved if astral-projection/out of body experiences are a real thing (which I think they are).  Of course the normal situation is that one's mind/spirit leaves the body, either on purpose or by trauma, wanders about for some bit for whatever set of reasons, and then comes back and flows back into the body -- at least in all the cases where the person comes back to tell us about it.  Some people have cultivated a skill in this.  Some surprising-to-me people have had uncontrolled (trauma-induced) out-of-body experiences.  I don't recall ever playing this game this way myself, except once when it started to slip out and I was like "HEY" and scrabbled it back in, so I have some decent initial instinctual skills or control but am not speaking as some sort of expert.

Anyhow, I think it would be interesting if the actual key to teleportation was about astral-projection traveling to where you wanted to go, and then rejoining your body to your mind/spirit, instead of rejoining your mind/spirit to your body.  It would require some of the same mind-bend that the physics solutions to traveling or walking through solid objects require (one has to fully commit to "physical reality" being just math and energy-states, not "material" in any fundamental sense -- "there is no spoon" and all that).  

This solves the ends-up-in-space and impossible-level-of-precision problems.  And it solves the equally important problems of making sure the body arrives on (or very close to at least) the ground and in clear air (not in space already occupied by a wall, or a tree, or a person, for instance).

It doesn't really solve the matter-already-exists-here problem, and it doesn't make sense that the air would magically exchange places to where you were, since the air can't astral-project itself and in any case has no reason to know where you came from, so one might still die a very messy death, but perhaps the body would show up in some sort of expands-into-reality manner that pushes the air aside ... locally loud, no doubt (interesting that Rowling included the noise in the Harry Potter series), but (presuming it displaced instead of creating a physics paradox) the air pressure change for the volume of one person leaving or arriving would be fairly minimal in terms of damage at point of departure or arrival.

I suppose if one also mastered walking through walls, one might apparate to someplace, air-included, and then move the air out of one's body-space, like a reverse of walking through a wall.  Walk the wall out of oneself.  Same reversal-of-beliefs/understandings as the teleportation proposal, actually, just hold "reality" to be the other side of the coin from what we have been taught to believe.

Anyhow I'm fairly pleased with solving the logic of not ending up in outer space and it being an intuitive process instead of one that requires 15 supercomputers and probably still wouldn't drop a white mouse within 2000 miles of where it was meant to appear.

I have been pretty sure for a long time now that if humans ever achieve time travel or teleportation, it will be by intuitive motion through time-space and not by machine.

OK, I have a Thing To Say: on whether "it" can be "worth it," and general "moral" responsibility

OK so I finished that Adlerian-psychology book and started in on the Daniel Howell book and I need to stop and capture (YELL ACTUALLY BECAUSE I'M VERY ANGRY) this set of thoughts which has been coalescing for twenty years.

People are often saying "I'm so glad I didn't kill myself, it was all worth it because life is good now" and I just fundamentally object to the "it will all be worth it, just stick with it" platitudes as regards "I had a horribly hard and hurtful life but now it's OK so all that horrible stuff must have been OK too because it was Part Of My Journey(TM)."

FABULOUS if you feel better now -- yay you!, big fan!, love you lots!, I will honestly cheer and be happy for you in real time if we are interacting <3!

But don't give the bad moral actors any credit.  Their evil is not yours and there is NO moral requirement for you to accept ANY of it.

"I'm so glad I didn't kill myself"? Yay <3!  "All the shit was worth it?" Toxic toxic toxic.

-----

1) Just to get this out of the way, although most of my readers will have read this item once or twice from me before:  For some people (most people actually) life literally never "gets better."  Look at history and there are lots of people, probably actually the vast, vast majority of people, for whom life was shit and then they died.  Moments of happiness, small joys, but it never "got better."  People might find spiritual enlightenment or some other version of peace, people might find love, but most people in all of human history have in very practical terms had very, very hard lives, and those lives generally only got (and get) harder and more painful as humans age.

"It got better" isn't a thing for most people, most places, most times.

It isn't *actually* a thing in modern America for most people -- that whole "it's probably going to get significantly better" thing is a MYTH and most Americans self-medicate one way or another because the "truth" (lies) we are told about "how to acheive happiness" don't match reality but we are all working hard to do the "right" things and still everything hurts and therefore there is (quite logically if one accepts the baseline lies) no actual, workable answer, and deadening (or finding ways to otherwise deny) the pain is the best solution for psychological survival in a system designed both to inflict pain and prevent access to real remedies.

-----

2) But my actual Thing I Have to Say is that if someday my life actually manages to do this magical turnaround thing that some people insist on telling me it "will" do (if I just [fill in their preferred blank]), and someone tries to rejoice with me by implying or asking, See, wasn't it all worth it?  ...

Let's think big and say, on a talk show.

Let's think little and say, over quiet tea in a stable-seeming living situation.

THE ANSWER IS NO.

NO.  NONE OF THIS SHIT WAS "WORTH IT."

PEOPLE BEING CRUEL INDIVIDUALLY WAS NOT "WORTH IT."

PEOPLE ACCEPTING CRUEL EXISTING TEACHINGS AND SYSTEMS THAT HURT ME AND OTHER PEOPLE WAS NOT "WORTH IT."

I WILL NEVER, EVER BE IN ANY WAY GRATEFUL FOR, OR ACCEPTING OF, PEOPLE HAVING BEEN SHITTY.

NOT TO ME, NOR TO ANYONE ELSE.  FUCK THAT.

AND

ALSO:

!!!!!

I have quite a lot of friends and some relatives who believe (more or less literally depending on the person) in each of us literally having chosen, before birth, this specific life we each are living.

I am even willing to give y'all that (I don't find that in practical moral terms it makes a difference for me, so I don't actually care).

But let's play that game and look at the logic of most of the 'self help''ish books, videos, and teachers out there, regarding the idea that "you chose this life."

If I showed up in this life AND PEOPLE TREATED ME WITH CRUELTY

there is NOT ACTUALLY AN INHERENT, LOGICAL REASON TO ASSERT THAT I 

--> "ASKED FOR" THAT, 

--> "DESERVED" THAT, NOR 

--> "NEEDED TO LEARN SOMETHING FROM" THAT.

I categorically refuse that.  I refuse all of it.  People being shitty is ON THEM.

FULL.

FUCKING.

STOP.

I *can* accept that I showed up -- that we each showed up -- offering an open heart so that the people we came in contact with could choose to learn to be better humans, so that they could choose love, so that they could learn to *see* and to *care* better.

If the humans we showed up "for" (or nearby, anyhow) didn't *do* that, THAT IS ON THEM.

NO HUMAN ASKED TO BE BORN INTO CRUELTY.

ZERO.

I DON'T BELIEVE THAT HAPPENS.

PERIOD.

I do NOT accept that ANY being asks, at ANY level, to be abused.

And every "teacher" who has every told any "student" that that was true?  Is part of the deep structure that holds the lies and the abuse in place.

NO.

So fuck that whole "it was all worth it" idea.

And also all versions of "you are morally required to be grateful for what you receive in this life."

NO.

IF SOMEONE CHOOSES TO BE SHITTY, THAT IS NOT MY PROBLEM.  IT'S NOT MY RESPONSIBILITY.  IT'S NOT MY FAULT.

EVEN IF I, REAL-TIME, *ACTUALLY* ASKED SOMEONE TO BE SHITTY?

IT 

WOULD 

--> STILL <--

BE 

--> THEIR <--

MORAL 

CHOICE 

TO DO SO.

I ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO BELIEVE *I* "NEEDED" TO "LEARN" SOMETHING THAT REQUIRED ANY OTHER PERSON TO BE HORRIBLE.

THIS SHIT RIGHT NOW (which -- current version -- is due to a really unfortunate-for-me confluence of structural inequities as opposed to people being individually nasty, so ... an improvement, and a testament to how much work I have *successfully* done to stop being buried in mean people's active individual shitstorms)

ALL THE TIMES PEOPLE CHOSE TO HURT ME OR CHOSE NOT TO STEP UP WHEN I WAS A KID

ALL THE TIMES PEOPLE CHOSE TO HURT ME OR CHOSE NOT TO STEP UP WHEN I WAS A TEEN

ALL THE TIMES PEOPLE CHOSE TO HURT ME OR CHOSE NOT TO STEP UP WHEN I WAS A YOUNG ADULT

NONE OF IT

NOT ANY OF IT

WAS EVER, IS EVER, NOR WILL IT EVER "HAVE BEEN, LOOKING BACK"

"WORTH IT."

That is all bullshit and I will *not* accept moral responsibility on any level for other people choosing fear in their actions instead of courage/love.  I will only take moral responsibility for the times I choose fear in *my* actions instead of courage/love.

How badly I've been treated was not something I asked for.  It's not something I believe ANY of us asked for, not even as Soul-Seeds in the Infinite Glowing Wisdom Space or whatever the current in-fashion words are.  If you offered to trust that people would love and care for you --  maybe, even, you did it as a generous gift of hope and love *to/for those people* -- if they didn't step up and be good (or at least decent) humans, that is *NOT YOUR FAULT.*

-----

I don't believe darkness is required to see the light.  I have never believed that, and I've never seen anything in my life experience that actually supports that, but I have seen the assertion used in real time by a lot of people to "justify" their dark spaces that are *actively hurting other people* [side rant here redacted].

There is a central core of reality -- somehow -- of truth and love, and the further away things are from it, the less true they are; there doesn't need to be "another side" to that.  There *isn't* "another side" of that.  We mentally construct it because we fear facing the full light of love, and would like to believe we are choosing "something" rather than just running away in fear.

"Balance" as a "moral value" requires us to accept both mediocrity and *evil.*

Nope nope nope'ity nope.

NO.

-----

And lest the "good Christians" in the crowd think you are getting off easy because I have particular beef with the new age'y post-modern Western-Civ versions of reincarnation-teaching, most of that "if shit happened to you it must be your fault somehow" teaching is definitely firmly in the "theological" foundations of nearly all "Christian" denominations in America and without exception *is the foundation* of every major cultural structure in our nation, because it was part of the "Christian" "theology" that was in vogue among the elites in the 1700s.

I've heard "it will all be worth it" from WAY more Christian-heritage or actively Christian people than from my pagan, new age, or secularist friends.

"It will all be worth it" is not a statement of hope.  It's a statement designed to bury the reality of structural inequalities in our society that literally guarantee that for most people it will never "all have been worth it."  It's a statement designed to suppress conversations around difficult but necessary changes.

Maybe we get to go to Heaven at the end of life.  But there is no logical requirement to experience pain to get to Heaven, and experiencing pain does not make a person more holy or worthy or any other thing that would theologically justify "it will all be worth it."

There is only a requirement to *love.*

The ONLY requirement, is to love.

A human succeeds or fails *as a human* according to whether and how strongly they chose *love.*  How much they chose to grow towards love, and matured towards love, and gave love, and accepted love.

(Real love.  Not just anything people find convenient to label "love" so they can abuse others, but with added-bonus, extra-effective gaslighting.)

Hurting people because we can't be bothered to face our own pain and fears is never, ever justified.  It's understandable.  It's forgivable, for those with a will to forgive.  But it's never justified.  And nothing about the results will be "worth it" that wouldn't have been better and more "worth it" if more loving and honest choices had been made in the first place.

-----

Anyhow I have a lot of feelings about this.

The last few years I'm just *really, spectacularly* tired of people telling me 

--> "well I'm glad you see *your* responsibility for *your* situation" (that was one of the most WTF responses I've ever gotten tbh -- probably because I rarely talk to people as deeply Americanized as that person was), or 

--> "it will all be worth it someday just hold on," or 

--> "yes it's a hard life but we each asked for what we got," 

or a million other versions of 

--> "when people are horrible it's probably at least partly if not wholly your own fault and also we must avoid having honest conversations about how much of this pain is structurally designed into society and actually entirely unnecessary if people in general weren't systematically beaten into being terrified of radical love."

The choices I made in my life should, in any *actually rationally healthy* society, not have ended up with me being housing insecure and food insecure and my children only seeing me every month or two simply because of my economic hardship (and not because anyone doesn't want to see each other, or they live far away, or ... ).

My situation is a reason to reevaluate anything you think is "good" or "working" about American structures, not a reason to hope for a fairy godmother or a winning lottery ticket so I can "be happy and well" and everyone can again conveniently repress how stupidly shitty our whole social assumptions-set is because somehow -- magically -- "it all turned out alright."

(I wouldn't say no to a winning lottery ticket, don't get me wrong.  But the level of bullshit is still the level of bullshit.  The value of the next moment does not change the value of this moment.  And anyhow I'd probably stay poor because I'd rather see as many immediate broad scale positive social changes as possible with the hope of preventing more of my situation, rather than 'rescuing' one of me, so after paying off debts and putting just enough away to reasonably prevent being a further drain on my safety nets I'd be spending/ giving away all the money -- carefully -- anyhow.)

-----

There is probably more but that is enough for now.